| 高红.各国机构RDA政策声明及与AACR2条款比较分析——以题名著录与检索点为例[J].数字图书馆论坛,2018,(1):39~45 |
| 各国机构RDA政策声明及与AACR2条款比较分析——以题名著录与检索点为例 |
| Case Study of Title Description and Access Point Analysis on RDA Policy Statements of Five Organizations and Comparison to AACR2: |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: RDA政策声明;英语国家;德语国家;AACR2 |
| 英文关键词: Policy Statement of RDA;English-Speaking Countries;German-Speaking Countries;AACR2 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2007 |
| 全文下载次数: 1463 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 本文以题名著录和检索点为例,分析英语国家和德语国家R DA政策声明的内容与差异.通过比较显示,RDA与AACR2相同的条款、以美国为代表的英语国家政策声明与AACR2相同的条款均占主要部分,而德语国家与英语国家政策声明的差异明显.通过分析表明,RDA相较于AACR2增加的本地化选项,增加对非英美体系国家或地区的适应度,提高其成为全球通用标准的可能性. |
| 英文摘要: |
| The article takes title description and access point as an example, analyzes the content and differences of RDA policy statements in English and German-speaking countries. The comparison shows that most of RDA's instructions are the same as the AACR2's, and most of LC-PCC PS which represents English-speaking countries' policy statements are the same as the AACR2's, while the differences between the German-speaking countries and the English-speaking countries are obvious. The analysis shows that RDA is more adaptable to non-Anglo-American systems than AACR2, because of its localization options which increases its likelihood of becoming a universal standard. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
