文章摘要
伍丹炜,刘宇.学术论文的可读性与影响力研究——基于人文社会科学学科差异的视角[J].数字图书馆论坛,2023,(9):20~29
学术论文的可读性与影响力研究——基于人文社会科学学科差异的视角
Readability and Influence of Academic Papers: From the Perspective of Disciplinary Differences in Humanities and Social Sciences
投稿时间:2023-07-05  
DOI:10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2023.09.003
中文关键词: 文本可读性;学术传播;被引频次;学科差异
英文关键词: Text Readability; Academic Communication; Citation Frequency; Disciplinary Difference
基金项目:本研究得到国家社会科学基金一般项目“中国人文社会科学领域的学术诚信观念与行为研究”(编号:20BTQ019)资助。
作者单位
伍丹炜 云南大学历史与档案学院 
刘宇 云南大学新闻学院 
摘要点击次数: 556
全文下载次数: 528
中文摘要:
      可读性是论文质量的重要特征之一,影响着读者对研究内容的认知与理解。探索文本可读性与论文影响力之间的关系对学术知识的有效传播有着重要的现实意义。以2016—2020年由图书情报学、新闻传播学以及管理学3个学科代表性期刊发表的论文为样本,研究摘要可读性与全文可读性对被引频次的影响,并检验学科之间的差异。研究发现:摘要易读而全文难读的论文更容易成为高被引论文,学科作为调节变量对摘要可读性及被引频次的关系、全文可读性和被引频次的关系均有显著的影响。作者应在保证严谨精确表达的基础上,尽可能提升论文的可读性,以促进学科知识的交流与发展。
英文摘要:
      Readability is one of the important characteristics of paper quality, which affects readers’ cognition and understanding of research contents. Exploring the relationship between the readability of a paper and its influence is of great practical significance to the effective dissemination of academic knowledge. This study examines the impact of abstract readability and full-text readability on citation frequency based on papers published in representative journals of library and information science, journalism and communication, and management from 2016 to 2020, and tests the difference between the disciplines. It is found that papers with easy-to-read abstracts and hard-to-read full-text are more likely to be highly cited, and as the moderating variable, discipline has significant impact on the relationship between abstract readability and citation frequency and the relationship between full-text readability and citation frequency. Writers should strive to enhance the readability of the paper while ensuring rigorous and precise expression, so as to promote the exchange and development of subject knowledge.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

分享按钮