| 陈莉.中、美、英、加四国图书情报领域影响力比较分析[J].数字图书馆论坛,2019,(9):47~54 |
| 中、美、英、加四国图书情报领域影响力比较分析 |
| Comparative Analysis of Influence in the Field of Library Information Science: Taking China, United States, United Kingdom and Canada as Examples |
| 投稿时间：2019-07-02 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2019.09.007 |
| 中文关键词: 领域影响力；领域活跃度；领域覆盖度；领域传播力；ISLS |
| 英文关键词: Domain Influence; Domain Activity; Domain Coverage; Domain Transmissibility; ISLS |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2925 |
| 全文下载次数: 1729 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 在国际学术领域，各国都重视科研产出，由于科研实力等因素的影响，需要构建科学合理的评价指标，以分析一个国家的领域影响力。以领域活跃度、领域覆盖度、领域传播力作为计量指标，以Web of Science为数据来源，依据其学科类别划分标准，以图书情报学（Information Science & Library Science，ISLS）为例，将中国、美国、英国、加拿大作为重点研究对象，对近十年四国的领域影响力进行对比分析。通过逐年领域活跃度、逐年领域覆盖度、领域传播力的计算，发现近十年来，美国的领域影响力保持绝对优势，领域活跃度、覆盖度都位居前列；英国的领域影响力呈上升趋势，与美国相比拥有绝对竞争优势；加拿大处于总体平稳发展的态势；2013年以后，中国作为后起之秀，领域影响力逐渐与英、美两国并驾齐驱，引领学科的发展，但仍需从跨学科合作、国际合作、国内文献国际化出发，进一步提升领域影响力。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In the international academic field, all countries attach importance to scientific research output. Because of the influence of scientific research strength and other factors, we need to build scientific and reasonable evaluation indicators to analyze the influence of a country. Taking domain activity, domain coverage and domain transmissibility as measurement indicators, using Web of Science as the data source, according to the classification standard of its subject category, taking Information Science & Library Science as an example, taking China, United States, United Kingdom and Canada as the key research objects and leading to the 4 countries in the last ten years. The domain influence is compared and analyzed. In the past ten years, the United States has an absolute advantage, the domain activity and the coverage of the United States remain in the forefront. The United Kingdom has an upward trend in the field of influence and has an absolute competitive advantage over the United States; Canada is in a general steady development trend; After 2013, as a rising star, China’s influence in the field has gradually kept pace with the United Kingdom and the United States, leading the development of disciplines. However, we still need to further enhance the influence of the field from the perspective of interdisciplinary cooperation, international cooperation and internationalization of domestic literature. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
