F1000医学版收录期刊与科学引文索引的对比分析

秦勇; 庞敏; 王婷婷

文章摘要

秦勇,庞敏,王婷婷.F1000医学版收录期刊与科学引文索引的对比分析[J].数字图书馆论坛,2012,(5):67~70

F1000医学版收录期刊与科学引文索引的对比分析

Medical Journals in Evaluating Tools: SCI vs.F1000 Medical Edition

DOI：

中文关键词: F1000医学版;科学引文索引;期刊评价;影响因子;推荐比

英文关键词: F1000 medical edition;SCI;Journal evaluation;Impact factor;Suggest ratio

基金项目:

作者	单位
秦勇	沈阳军区总医院
庞敏	北京万方数据股份有限公司
王婷婷	沈阳军区总医院

摘要点击次数: 1987

全文下载次数: 1311

中文摘要:

科学引文索引在生物医学领域的文献、作者、期刊评价中发挥着重要作用.F1000医学版的推出为医学文献、期刊的评价提供了新的途径.本研究的目的是通过对F1000医学版收录文献的分析并与SCI进行对比,研究SCI和F1000医学版对评价医学期刊的差异,为有效提高医教研水平提供帮助.方法:获取F1000医学版从推出到2011年11月收录的被推荐文献,按照所属期刊、年度进行统计分析.通过检索medline获得各种期刊、各年度的发表文献总量,获得各种期刊、各年度的推荐比并排序,并与SCI相对比.结果:F1000医学版与SCI共同收录的医学期刊共1620种.在这1620种期刊中,按推荐比、推荐文献量和IF值分别进行排序,相互之间排序结果相差较大.结论:F1000医学版对评价医学期刊的权威性的评价与SCI存在较大差异.F1000医学版的评价在对医学期刊的评价中发挥着与SCI同等重要的作用.

英文摘要:

Science Citation Index (SCI) plays an important role in evaluating documents, authors and journals in medical field. F1000 gives an alternative to evaluations on documents and journals. The puipose of this study is to find differences of evaluating outcomes between SCI and F1000 medical edition by means of comparison between F1000 tneliological analysis and SCI data. Methods: Data were collected from F1000 medical edition from very beginning to November, 2011 and analyzed from the aspects of year and journals that they belong to. We searched OVID Medline to acquire total numbers of documents of each journal and each year and then calculated the suggest ratio of these journals by years or total. After sorting by suggest number and by suggest rabo, we compared it with SCI data. Result: 1620 journals were indexed by these two evaluating tools. There were big differences in sorting outcomes between sorting by suggest number, by suggest ratio and by IF. Conclusion: There were big differences in evaluating outcomes between SCI and F1000 medical edition when medical journals were evaluated. H1000 medical edition plays the same important role as SCI in evaluating medical journals.

查看全文查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器

关闭