| 王晓光,宋宁远.科学论文内容本体比较研究[J].数字图书馆论坛,2017,(8):2~7 |
| 科学论文内容本体比较研究 |
| Review on the Scientific Paper Component Ontologies |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 语义出版;科学论文;内容本体;内容组件;比较分析 |
| 英文关键词: Semantic Publishing;Scientfic Paper;Content Ontology;Paper Component;Comparative Analysis |
| 基金项目:本研究得到中组部"万人计划"和教育部"新世纪优秀人才"项目资助. |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2049 |
| 全文下载次数: 1721 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 科学论文内容本体规范地定义了构成科学论文的内容组件及其关系,比较不同本体的差异有助于更全面地理解论文内容单元的多维语义属性,进而开发更完善的富语义出版物模型.在回顾科学论文内容本体产生及发展历史基础上,选取具有代表性的6种科学论文内容本体,从组件及关系角度分析不同本体的差异,探讨其理论根源和应用.分析表明,科学论文内容本体类型多样,但在组件及关系分类和属性定义上缺乏统一的理论框架,又因领域和情景差异,在一定程度上制约了内容本体的实例化应用.未来有必要加强用户需求研究,进一步明确本体开发方向,提高内容本体的可用性. |
| 英文摘要: |
| Scientific paper component ontologies standardize the definition of components and relationships within scientific articles. Reviewing and comaparatively analyzing these ontologies is significant for the ful y understanding of the multi-dimensional semantic at ributions within scientific articles, facilitating the progress of semantic publishing systems. Based on the review about the development of scientific paper component ontologies, six typical ontologies that were put forward recently are chosen as research objects, comparatively analzed the components and relations that these ontologies defined, explored the fundamental theories and the applications. There are varied types of scientific paper component ontologies, which are lack of an unified fundamental theories to support the standard definitions about the classes and the properties, restricts the popularization and application. In the future, the user demand of component ontologies should be taken into consideration, the direction of the development should be clarified to improve the usability of component ontologies. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
