| 余波,邱均平.期刊编委国际学术话语权评价研究[J].情报工程,2021,7(3):018-031 |
| 期刊编委国际学术话语权评价研究 |
| Research on the Evaluation of International Academic Discourse Power of Journal Editors |
| |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.2095-915X.2021.03.002 |
| 中文关键词: 国际学术话语权；期刊编委；评价研究；学术主体 |
| 英文关键词: International academic discourse power; journal editorial board; evaluation research; academic subject |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目“我国‘五计学’融合与图书情报学的方法创新研究”(18BTQ080)。 |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 余波 | 杭州电子科技大学中国科教评价研究院 | | 邱均平 | 杭州电子科技大学中国科教评价研究院 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2129 |
| 全文下载次数: 1973 |
| 中文摘要: |
| [ 目的 / 意义 ] 国际学术话语权是目前国内外学界关注的焦点问题，对中国学术编委话语权进行评价和分析，可更全面的了解中国学术编委的国际学术话语权地位和作用。[ 方法 / 过程 ] 本文在梳理学术期刊和学术话语权及其关系的基础上，以国际生物医学学科的高影响力期刊 Archives of Toxicology为例，从学术主体视角深入探讨了学术编委的国际学术话语权。[ 结果 / 结论 ] 发现国际学术编委的学术话语权呈现出较大的差异，中国在该领域学术编委的国际学术话语权还有待提升。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| [Objective/ Significance]International academic discourse power is currently the focus of attention in academic circles at home and abroad. Evaluation and analysis of the discourse power of Chinese academic editors can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the status and role of Chinese academic editors’ international academic discourse power. [Methods/Process]On the basis of sorting out academic journals and academic discourse power and their relationship, Taking the high-impact journal “Archives of Toxicology” in the international biomedical sciences as an example, this paper discusses the international academic discourse power of academic editors from the perspective of academic subjects. [Results /Conclusions] It is found that the academic discourse power of international academic editors is quite different, and it is proposed that the international academic discourse power of Chinese academic editors in this field needs to be improved. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
