| 苟扬,李睿,李娟.中日两国地震应急技术专利数据可视化分析与对比研究[J].情报工程,2022,8(4):071-084 |
| 中日两国地震应急技术专利数据可视化分析与对比研究 |
| Visualization Analysis and Comparative Study of Earthquake Emergency Response Technology Patent Data in China and Japan |
| |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.2095-915X.2022.04.007 |
| 中文关键词: 德温特专利数据；知识图谱；文献计量指标；CiteSpace；地震应急技术 |
| 英文关键词: Derwent Patent Data; knowledge atlas; bibliometrics indicator; CiteSpace; earthquake emergency technology |
| 基金项目:国家社科基金西部项目“创新经济学视野下的专利引用关系再认识及其评价意义再研究”（20XTQ008）。 |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 苟扬 | 四川大学灾后重建与管理学院 成都 610207 | | 李睿 | 四川大学灾后重建与管理学院 成都 610207 | | 李娟 | 四川大学灾后重建与管理学院 成都 610207 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 893 |
| 全文下载次数: 1215 |
| 中文摘要: |
| [ 目的 / 意义 ] 对比中日两国地震应急技术在研究现状、关键技术、研发热点和演进路径上的共性和特性，为中国相关应急产业的发展规划提供参考。[ 方法 / 过程 ] 基于德温特专利数据库（DII）中 1966-2021 年收录的中日两国地震应急领域相关专利，借助 CiteSpace 软件进行专利文献计量、代码共现分析、聚类分析、时间线分析。[ 结果 / 结论 ]中国地震应急技术的研究滞后日本近 10 年；日本技术创新的主体是企业，企业间合作密切，而中国以高校和国有企业为主体，且机构间缺乏合作；两国在地震应急领域的关键技术发展方向上基本保持一致，但是在监测预警、应急通讯、建筑抗震等热点领域，日本已经度过技术成熟期，而中国仍处于技术追随阶段；相比中国，日本在地震应急技术的智能化、无人机技术等新兴领域研究更深入。最后针对中国地震应急技术的发展提出了 4 点建议。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| [Objective/Significance] The similarities and characteristics of earthquake emergency response technology in research status, key technologies, research hotspots and evolution paths between China and Japan are compared to provide a reference for the development planning of related emergency industries in China. [Methods/Processes] Based on the patent information related to earthquake emergency response in China and Japan collected in Derwent Innovations Index(DII) from 1966 to 2021, patent bibliometrics, code co-occurrence analysis, cluster analysis, and timeline analysis were performed with the help of CiteSpace software. [Results/Conclusions] The results showed that the research on earthquake emergency response technology in China lags behind that in Japan by nearly 10 years; The institutions of technological innovation in Japan are mainly enterprises, and the cooperation between enterprises is close; However, China’s innovation institutions are mainly universities and state-owned enterprises, and there is a lack of cooperation between these institutions; The development direction of key technologies in the field of earthquake emergency response is basically the same between the two countries. However, in hot areas such as monitoring and early warning, emergency communication, building earthquake resistance, etc, Japan has already passed the technology maturity stage, while China is still in the technology following stage; compared with China, Japan has more in-depth research in emerging fields such as the intelligence of earthquake emergency technology and UAV technology. Finally, four suggestions are put forward for the development of earthquake emergency technology in China. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
