| 曲敖廷,沈云怡,杨云,张大康,任孝平.中国与共建“一带一路”国家合作领域特征研究——基于元首外交对话分析的视角[J].情报工程,2024,10(2):027-037 |
| 中国与共建“一带一路”国家合作领域特征研究——基于元首外交对话分析的视角 |
| Research on the Field Characteristics of Cooperation between China and the “Belt and Road” Partner Countries ——Based on the Analysis of Diplomatic Dialogue between Heads of States |
| |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.2095-915X.2024.02.003 |
| 中文关键词: 一带一路；元首外交；合作领域；交叉分析 |
| 英文关键词: Belt and Road; Head of State Diplomacy; Fields of Cooperation; Cross Analysis |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金专项项目“基础研究国际合作跨境数据管理研究”（L2124029）。 |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 曲敖廷 | 1. 科技部科技评估中心 国际评估处 北京 100081 | | 沈云怡 | 1. 科技部科技评估中心 国际评估处 北京 100081 | | 杨云 | 1. 科技部科技评估中心 国际评估处 北京 100081 | | 张大康 | 1. 科技部科技评估中心 国际评估处 北京 100081
2. Xihu Street, Wujin District, Changzhou City, Changzhou 213161, China | | 任孝平 | 1. 科技部科技评估中心 国际评估处 北京 100081 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 734 |
| 全文下载次数: 573 |
| 中文摘要: |
| [目的/意义]元首外交对话通常代表了国家合作意愿，以此为基础开展研究可以了解中国面向“一带一路”众多国别的合作领域特征与差异，助力合作者根据国家意愿开展合作部署。[方法/过程]分析梳理了首届“一带一路”国际合作高峰论坛以来，元首外交对话中涉及合作领域的相关内容；构建了合作领域的分类字典，并对中国与共建“一带一路”各国的合作领域进行统计分析；结合共建各国的国家发展阶段、地理距离以及所属多边机制（框架），从三个维度对合作领域进行交叉对比分析。[结果/结论]“一带一路”各领域合作更加倾向“一带一路”高收入国家和中等偏下收入国家，民心相通是高质量共建“一带一路”的最广泛基础，“一带一路”是对古丝绸之路的极大发扬，未来，“一带一路”将向安全领域、对非合作和人与自然等方面进一步发展延伸。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| [Objective/Significance] The diplomatic dialogues between heads of states usually represent the willingness of countries to cooperate. Research based on these can illustrate the characteristics and differences in China’s cooperation fields towards the “Belt and Road” partner countries, and help partners to deploy cooperation according to national will. [Methods/Processes] This paper analyzes and combs the relevant contents of the cooperation fields involved in the diplomatic dialogues of the heads of states since the First Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation. A classification dictionary of cooperation fields has been constructed, and statistical analysis has been carried out on the cooperation fields of China and countries jointly building the “Belt and Road”. Then, in combination with the national development stage, geographical distance and multilateral mechanism (framework) of the co-construction countries, it conducts cross comparative analysis of cooperation fields from three dimensions. [Results/Conclusions] The cooperation in various fields of the “Belt and Road” is more inclined to the “Belt and Road” high-income countries and lower middle income countries. People to people bond is the broadest basis for high-quality co-construction of the “Belt and Road”. The “Belt and Road” is a great promotion of the ancient Silk Road. In the future, the “Belt and Road” will further develop and extend to the security field, cooperation with Africa, and “people and nature”. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
