| 张翼燕,许 文.科技外交的工具分类研究[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2017,32(6):72~76 |
| 科技外交的工具分类研究 |
| Research on S&T Diplomacy Tools Classification |
| 投稿时间：2017-06-03 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1009-8623.2017.06.011 |
| 中文关键词: 科技外交；战略工具；操作工具；支持工具 |
| 英文关键词: S&T diplomacy; strategic tools; operational tools; support tools |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2611 |
| 全文下载次数: 2363 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 本文介绍了主要国家开展科技外交的主要实践活动，基于其战略地位和内容、手段的不同，将其划分为三种类型的工具：战略工具、操作工具和支持工具。战略工具明确科技外交的目标方向，操作工具主要指各国开展科技外交实践的机制和策略，而支持工具则是促进科技外交实践的培训类和平台类活动。建议我国未来进一步整合科技外交操作工具，并长远谋划战略工具和大力发展支持工具。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The paper presents some practices of main countries on S&T diplomacy. Based on the differences of the strategic importance, contents and measures, they are classified into three kinds of tools, namely strategic tools, operational tools and support tools. Strategic tools establish the goals and directions of S&T diplomacy; operational tools are usually the mechanisms and approaches to practice S&T diplomacy; support tools are the activities such as training and platforms to promote S&T diplomacy practices. The paper suggests China to further integrate operational tools, to design strategic tools from a long-term view and to develop support tools. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
