| 赵星宇,白 杨.英国科研领域同行评议管理的现状与发展[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2020,35(11):33~36 |
| 英国科研领域同行评议管理的现状与发展 |
| The Status and Development of Peer Review Management in UK Scientific Research |
| 投稿时间：2020-09-11 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1009-8623.2020.11.006 |
| 中文关键词: 英国；同行评议；科技管理；监督评估 |
| 英文关键词: UK; peer review; science and technology management; supervision and evaluation |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1941 |
| 全文下载次数: 1310 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 同行评议是科研领域科学决策和科技资源配置的基础，对同行评议的管理优化非常必要。本文分析总结了英国科技期刊出版商和科技管理部门在同行评议管理方面的做法及特点，主要发现包括：一是重视同行评议的不可替代性，但承认其局限性；二是重视与行业协会等非政府组织的合作，在探索中发展开放式同行评议；三是发挥同行评议组织者的作用，重视同行评议参与者的培训。借鉴英国的做法，中国科技界在同行评议中，一是要厘清同行评议和行政管理的职责；二是要重视对同行评议专家的培训；三是要夯实决策者决策的主体责任，确保同行评议意见科学可靠。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Peer review is the basis for scientific decision-making, as well as for scientific and technical resource allocation. It is necessary to optimize the management of peer review. Through on-site investigation in UK and literature research, this paper summarizes its peer review management characteristics as follows: attach importance to the peer review but recognize its limitations; cooperate with non-governmental organizations, and develop open peer review; give important role to the peer review organizer, and pay attention to the training of peer review participants. The journal editorial department and science and technology management department in China should clarify the role of policy makers and peer reviewers, pay attention to the training of peer reviewers, strengthen the primary responsibilities of decision makers to ensure that the peer review is scientific and reliable. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
