文章摘要
魏秀菊,赵光磊.初探科技期刊学术不端论文的判定[J].中国科技资源导刊,2010,(5):6~10
初探科技期刊学术不端论文的判定
Judging Academic Papers with Plagiarisms and Proofing from Them for ScitechologyJournal Publish
  
DOI:
中文关键词: 不端论文;防范;科技期刊出版;文献重复率;抄袭判定
英文关键词: plagiarized submissions, sci-tech journal publishing, text repetition rate, judging plagiarism
基金项目:
作者单位
魏秀菊,赵光磊 (1. 农业部规划设计研究院,中国农业工程学会,《农业工程学报》编辑部,北京 100026 ; 2. 北京食品研究所,《食品科学》编辑部,北京 100026 
摘要点击次数: 3075
全文下载次数: 4135
中文摘要:
      通过分析《农业工程学报》防范学术不端论文的实践及取得的成效,论述了学术期刊抵制不端论文的重要性 和期刊的责任。鉴于目前我国相关政策及管理体制的缺失,建议政府及管理机构加强学术规范的基础性建设,促进学术 团体组织制定行业或领域的学术规范,实现科技期刊出版业与学术界的互动。文章重点研究了论文的文本重复率与抄袭 的关系,得出文本重复率是判定论文是否有抄袭问题的参考指标,而不能作为唯一依据。判定论文是否抄袭,应采取定 量、定性相结合的方法, 特别要关注研究对象、研究方法和研究结果等论文的主体部分内容是否重复,同时考虑不同学科 领域、同一领域不同类型的论文的允许重复率的差别。
英文摘要:
      Discussing the importance and the responsibilities of academic journals in preventing plagiarized submissions from publishing, through the analysis of relevant practice of Transactions of Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering and its effectiveness. Considering the absence of the related policy and regulatory mechanism, suggestions are made for government and administrative agencies to facilitate the development of fundamental code of academic conduct, for academic societies to develop professional or discipline-specific norms, and to strengthen the interactions between sci-tech publishers and academic communities. The paper focuses on the relationships between the text repetition rate and actual plagiarism, and concludes that the text repetition rate is a reference indictor of plagiarism, but not an only or reliable evidence. For judging plagiarism, quantitative and qualitative analysis should be combined, and attention should be paid to the repetitions in the main contents, such as the subjects, methodology and research findings, and different acceptable repetition rate concerning submissions in different disciplines or in the same discipline but with different paper types should also be considered.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

分享按钮