| 戚 欢 刘 臻 刘宏军.科技查新与专利新颖性的比对研究[J].中国科技资源导刊,2016,(4):57~61 |
| 科技查新与专利新颖性的比对研究 |
| Comparison Research with Regard to Science and Technology Retrieval andPatent Novelty |
| 投稿时间：2016-06-22 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 专利新颖性；查新；抵触申请；优先权；比对分析 |
| 英文关键词: patent novelty, novelty retrieval, conflicting application, priority, comparative analysis |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 戚 欢 刘 臻 刘宏军 | 吉林省科学技术信息研究所科技查新咨询中心，吉林长春 130033 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1641 |
| 全文下载次数: 1730 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 专利文献是科技文献的一项主要情报来源，检索专利数据库也是查新工作中的一项重要工作内容，而专利
制度相对于查新工作又非常严谨和规范，这就为查新工作提供了借鉴之处。本文主要从查新与专利新颖性的定义、审
查主体、审查依据、判断原则等方面分析查新与专利新颖性的不同。通过二者的比对研究，发现两者之间的区别与紧
密联系，以此为进一步开展查新工作提供借鉴。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Not only patent literature is a major source of information in the scientific literature, but also
searching patent search database is also an important work job in the daily Novelty Retrieval. Furthermore,
Patent system with respect to Novelty Retrieval was very rigorous and standardized, which provides a reference
for the work of the Novelty Retrieval. This paper focuses on the discussion from the difference between patent
novelty judgment principle and novelty retrieval judgment principle from definition, review body, review basis,
judgment rule. To found that the relationship between the two items, in order to provide reference and promote
the search for the new job. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
