| 陈 帆1,2 王富忠1 姚卫新2.浙江省不同性质企业科技创新效率分析[J].中国科技资源导刊,2021,(5):74~84 |
| 浙江省不同性质企业科技创新效率分析 |
| Analysis on the Efficiency of Science and Technical Innovation of Enterprisesof Different Nature in Zhejiang Province |
| 投稿时间：2021-05-05 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 技术差距；科技创新；科技创新效率；共同前沿；价值链；最优方向 |
| 英文关键词: technology gap, scientific and technical innovation, efficient of scientific and technical innovation ,
meta-frontier, value chain, optimal direction |
| 基金项目:浙江省软科学研究计划项目“提升浙江省企业科技创新效率的政策研究——基于异质性技术视角”（2019C35048）。 |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 陈 帆1,2 王富忠1 姚卫新2 | （1.浙江科技学院经济与管理学院，浙江杭州 310023；2. 东华大学旭日工商管理学院，上海 200051） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 949 |
| 全文下载次数: 1034 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 基于共同前沿和价值链理论, 对2009—2018年浙江省不同性质企业不同阶段的科技创新效率、缩短技术差距
的最优技术改善方向和主要影响因素进行研究。研究结果表明：（1）2009—2018 年，浙江省不同性质企业科技研发阶段
的效率均值小于科技成果转化阶段；在科技研发阶段港澳台商投资企业的效率均值最高，在成果转化阶段外商投资企
业效率均值最高；内资企业在科技创新的两阶段中一直呈现追赶势头。（2）科技研发阶段内资企业的技术差距最小，主
要改善方向为减少研发人员；在成果转化阶段港澳台商投资企业的技术差距最小，主要改善方向为减少新产品开发经
费；不同阶段下不同性质企业缩短技术差距的最优改善方向显著不同。（3）企业规模、创新氛围与浙江省企业科技创新
效率显著正相关，市场竞争程度、产学研合作与其显著负相关。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Based on the theory of meta-frontier and value chain, this paper studies the efficiency of technical
innovation, the best technical improvement direction to shorten the technology gap and main factors affecting
efficiency in different stages of enterprises with different properties in Zhejiang province from 2009 to 2018.The
results show as follows:(1)The average efficiency of Zhejiang’s enterprises with different properties was lower
in the scientific and technical research and development stage than that in the transformation stage of scientific
and technical achievements from 2009 to 2018.The average efficiency of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwaninvested
enterprises in the scientific research and development stage is the highest, and the average efficiency of
foreign-invested enterprises in the transformation stage of scientific and technical achievements is the highest.
Domestic enterprises have been showing a catching-up momentum in the two stages of technical innovation.
(2) The technical gap of domestic enterprises in the scientific research and development stage is the smallest.
The main improvement direction is to reduce R&D personnel. In the stage of achievement transformation, the
technical gap of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan-invested enterprises is the smallest. The main improvementdirection is to reduce new product development expenses. The optimal improvement directions to shorten
the technical gap for different properties enterprises at different stages are significantly different.(3)Enterprise
scale and innovation atmosphere are significantly positively correlated with Zhejiang’s enterprise technical
innovation efficiency, while market competition and industry-university-research cooperation are significantly
negatively correlated with them. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
