| 陈军冰 1 卜 伟2 张道潘3.高校协同创新中心绩效评价回溯研究——以理工类江苏高校省部共建协同创新中心为例[J].中国科技资源导刊,2023,(2):43~53, 103 |
| 高校协同创新中心绩效评价回溯研究——以理工类江苏高校省部共建协同创新中心为例 |
| Retrospective Study on Performance Evaluation of Collaborative Innovation Center in Universities—Taking the Jiangsu Province-Ministry Collaborative Innovation Center of Science and Technology as an Example |
| 投稿时间：2022-07-08 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 省部共建协同创新中心；绩效评价；回溯研究；均值法；比较分析 |
| 英文关键词: Province-Ministry Collaborative Innovation Center, performance evaluation, retrospective study,averaging method, comparative analysis |
| 基金项目:江苏省社会科学基金项目“江苏高校协同创新机制与效能研究”（21JYB006） |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 陈军冰 1 卜 伟2 张道潘3 | （1. 河海大学水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室，江苏南京 210024 ；2. 江苏师范大学科学技术研究院，江苏徐州 221116；3. 南京审计大学科研处，江苏南京 211815） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 749 |
| 全文下载次数: 913 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 实施省部共建协同创新中心工作是教育部推进高校科技创新的一项重要举措。绩效评价是检验省部共建协同创新中心周期建设及成效的重要抓手。以江苏省8个理工类省部共建协同创新中心为例，以两个建设周期的绩效评价基本数据为样本，进行回溯研究。利用均值数据比较和赋权模型计算比较方法，分析省部共建协同创新中心整体及个体主要绩效指标状况，发现省部共建协同创新中心在科技创新主要指标方面成效显著，但存在整体示范作用不明显、社会服务能力不强、破除“唯SCI”不够等问题。基于此，提出加强过程监测和督促指导等建议。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The establishment of Province-Ministry Collaborative Innovation Centers is an important measure adopted by the Ministry of Education with aims to promote scientific and technological innovation in colleges and universities, and the evaluation of their performance provides a critical approach to examine the cyclical construction and achievements of the Province-Ministry collaborative innovation centers. This paper took 8 Jiangsu Province-Ministry collaborative innovation centers of science and technology as examples, and carried out retrospective study by use the outputs of their performance evaluation after two- cycle constructions. Based on the comparison of the mean value of key performance indicators with the value computed by the indicator-weight model, the general performance and the individual key performance indicators of collaborative innovation centers were analyzed. The results revealed that the Province-Ministry collaborative innovation centers gained significant achievements in terms of key science and technology innovation indicators, but their performance still needs to be improved further through enhancing their exemplary roles in science and technology innovation, strengthening social service ability and making more efforts to abolishing the “SCI-only” policy. Thus, some suggestions . Thus, some suggestions including the improvement of process monitoring and supervision were put forward. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
