| 张希1 孙雪原2 张昱1.国际科技论文撤稿特征分析[J].中国科技资源导刊,2023,(4):73~81 |
| 国际科技论文撤稿特征分析 |
| Analysis on the Characteristics of Withdrawal of International Scientific Papers |
| 投稿时间：2022-11-24 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 国际科技论文;撤稿;retraction watch;撤稿原因;学术不端 |
| 英文关键词: international scientific papers, withdraw the manuscript, retraction watch, reasons for withdrawal, academic misconduct |
| 基金项目:中国科学技术信息研究所创新研究基金青年项目“科技计划项目产出论文撤稿现状分析及学术不端治理研究” (QN2022-14) |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 张希1 孙雪原2 张昱1 | (1. 中国科学技术信息研究所，北京 100038
2. 首都经济贸易大学，北京 100070) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 516 |
| 全文下载次数: 1529 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 以 Retraction Watch 数据库中 34 693 篇撤稿论文为研究对象，以国际视角对撤销论文的时间分布、学科领域、来源种类、撤销原因、论文作者、科研机构、国家和地区等特征进行多角度分析。研究发现:国际论文撤稿的数量呈现上升的趋势，中国作者发表在国际期刊的撤稿论文数量位列全球第一，且近 3 年的撤稿增速高于全球水平;全球会议撤稿中有 92.36% 来自 2009—2011 年在中国举办的会议;医学、生物学、商业领域的论文撤销问题较为严重;50% 以上科技论文的撤销原因是存在学术不端行为;国际科技撤稿论文来源机构中，中国机构数量较多，并涉及多所双一流高校。基于此，建议加强科研机构与学术出版商的合作交流，追究学术不端法律责任，建立科学的职称聘评制度，引导科研人员自觉抵制学术不端行为，提升科研创新能力。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Taking 34, 693 retraction papers in retraction watch database as the research object, this paper analyzes the time distribution, subject field, source type, reasons for retraction, authors, research institutions, countries and regions of retraction papers from an international perspective. The number of retractions of international papers shows an increasing trend. The number of retracted papers published by Chinese authors in international journals ranks the first in the world, and the rate of retractions in recent three years is higher than the global level. 92.36% of global conference withdrawals were for conferences held in China from 2009 to 2011; The retraction of papers in the fields of medicine, biology and business is more serious. More than 50% of the retractions were due to academic misconduct; Among the international science and technology retraction papers source institutions, the number of Chinese institutions is large, and involves a number of double first-class universities. It is suggested to strengthen the cooperation and exchanges between research institutions and academic publishers, investigate the legal liability for academic misconduct, establish a scientific professional title recruitment and evaluation system, guide researchers to consciously resist academic misconduct, and improve the ability of scientific research and innovation. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
