| 张爱琴 周娟美 赵公民.省级公益类科研院所创新绩效评估及实证研究[J].中国科技资源导刊,2024,(3):103~110 |
| 省级公益类科研院所创新绩效评估及实证研究 |
| Evaluation and Empirical Study on Innovation Performance of Provincial Public Welfare Research Institutes |
| 投稿时间：2023-11-23 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 创新质量 ; 公益类科研院所;创新绩效;科技体制改革;转制院所 |
| 英文关键词: innovation quality, public welfare research institutes, innovation performance, reform of the scientific and technological system, conversion institutions |
| 基金项目:山西省高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目“新时代山西创新生态系统构建及耦合策略研究”(20200127);山西省科技战略研究专项“数智赋能背景下山西省区域创新生态系统运行效率测度、障碍因素及对策研究”(202304031401078);山西哲学社会科学规划课题项目“山西中部城市群创新能力差异及高质量协同发展路径研究”(2022YY104);山西省社科联课题项目“数字经济促进山西都市圈协同发展的机制及路径研究”(SSKLZDKT2023053) |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 张爱琴 周娟美 赵公民 | (中北大学经济与管理学院，山西太原 030051) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 105 |
| 全文下载次数: 137 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 在深化完善科研院所分类改革背景下，构建以创新质量和贡献为导向的包括创新基础、创新产出、成果转化、履职定位、创新环境在内的公益类科研院所创新绩效评价指标体系，并基于山西省省属科研院所数据，对三类科研院所创新绩效进行测度。研究发现:(1)公益一类、公益二类、转制事业单位三类科研院所在职责任务、服务对象和资源配置上存在着较大不同，绩效评价重点也因之变化;(2)比较创新绩效差异性，三类院所在履职定位和创新环境方面得分较为均衡，而在成果转化、创新产出、创新基础3个指标呈现较大差异;(3)省级公益类科研院所在基础设施、创新平台、高层次人才、创新产出、科技成果转化方面有待改善。基于此，针对不同类型科研院所创新绩效水平提升提出策略，以期为地方科研事业单位创新绩效改革提供决策依据。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| In the context of deepening and improving the classification reform of scientific research institutes, an innovation performance evaluation index system of public welfare scientific research institutes was constructed based on innovation quality and contribution, including innovation foundation, innovation output, achievement transformation, performance positioning, and innovation environment, and the innovation performance of the three types of scientific research institutes was measured based on the data of provincial scientific research institutes in Shanxi Province. The results show that: (1) there are great differences in the responsibilities, tasks, service objects and resource allocation of the three types of scientific research institutes in the first class of public welfare, the second type of public welfare and the transformed public institutions, and the focus of performance evaluation also changes accordingly; (2) through the comparison of innovation performance differences, the scores of the three types of institutes in terms of performance orientation and innovation environment are relatively balanced, while there are great differences in the three indicators of achievement transformation, innovation output and innovation foundation;(3) the infrastructure, innovation platform, high-level talents, innovation output, and the transformation of scientific and technological achievements needs to be improved. Finally, strategies for improving the innovation performance level of different types of scientific research institutes were proposed, in order to provide a decision-making basis for the innovation performance reform of local scientific research institutions. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
