| 张宇晨1 翁梦娟 2.西部欠发达地区上市公司增长能力研究[J].中国科技资源导刊,2024,(6):65~77 |
| 西部欠发达地区上市公司增长能力研究 |
| Configuration-Based Study of Enterprise Growth for Listed Enterprises in Underdeveloped Western China |
| 投稿时间：2024-03-20 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 企业增长能力;模糊集定性比较分析;西部地区;上市公司 |
| 英文关键词: enterprise growth, fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis, Western China, listed company |
| 基金项目:中国科学技术信息研究所重点工作项目“智能情报融合创新体系建设研究与应用”(ZD2023-11) |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 张宇晨1 翁梦娟 2 | (1. 中国科学技术信息研究所，北京 100038
2. 武汉大学信息管理学院，湖北武汉 430072) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 23 |
| 全文下载次数: 45 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 增长是企业问题的原点。当外部环境增速放缓时，企业应更加关注内部的增长能力。基于我国西部欠发达地区的287家上市企业的相关数据，运用模糊集定性比较分析方法，整合产业特征、模式创新、运营能力层面的6个条件，探索企业高增长能力的驱动模式。研究表明:提升需求潜力、战略变革和运营效率成为推动我国欠发达地区上市企业高增长能力的核心动力，而创新赋能、优质资源是助力企业高增长能力的辅助力量，3个核心条件组合形成了3条正向互补的等效路径(H1、H3、H4);有些企业仅通过较强的产业特征作为核心动力，替代非高的优质资源，单独驱动企业实现增长，形成了1条替代型的等效路径(H2)。根据组态特征，H1、H2、H3、H4分别命名为“传统高效型”“顺应时代型”“高效变革型”“优质研发型”。非高增长企业的驱动机制与高增长企业的驱动机制存在非对称性关系。研究结果为欠发达地区企业研究提供新思路，为寻找企业增长能力路径提供新视角。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Growth is the origin of business problems. When external conditions stagnate, companies must prioritize their internal growth potential. Based on the data of 287 listed Chinese enterprises in underdeveloped western regions, we use the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method to integrate six conditions at the level of industrial characteristics, model innovation, and operational capacity to explore the driving mode of high growth capacity of enterprises. The study shows that: Enhancement of demand potential, strategic change and operational efficiency become the core driving force to promote the high- growth capacity of listed enterprises in underdeveloped regions of China, while innovation empowerment and quality resources are the auxiliary forces to help the high-growth capacity of enterprises, and the combination of the three core conditions forms three positive and complementary paths of equivalence (H1, H3, H4). Notably, some companies have formed an alternative equivalent path (H2) by replacing non-high-quality resources with stronger industrial characteristics as the core driving force to achieve growth alone. Based on these configurations, H1, H2, H3 and H4 are named as ‘traditional and efficient’, ‘adaptive’, ‘efficient and transformational’ and ‘quality R&D’ respectively. High-quality R&D type’. There is an asymmetric relationship between the driving mechanisms of non-high-growth firms and those of high-growth firms. The results of the study provide new ideas for the study of enterprises in underdeveloped regions and new perspectives for finding the path of enterprise growth capacity. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
