| 韩颖霄1 张均胜 1, 2 郑 明 1 张兆锋 1.一种覆盖所有作者的论文荣誉分配方法——缓解署名分歧的量化锚点[J].中国科技资源导刊,2025,(6):48~63 |
| 一种覆盖所有作者的论文荣誉分配方法——缓解署名分歧的量化锚点 |
| A Comprehensive Credit Allocation Method for All Authors: Quantitative Anchor to Mitigate Authorship Disagreements |
| 投稿时间：2025-06-26 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 文献计量;合著作者;荣誉分配方法;《经济地质》期刊 |
| 英文关键词: bibliometrics, co-author, Credit Allocation Method, Economic Geology |
| 基金项目:中国科学技术信息研究所创新研究基金面上项目“量子领域早期投融资行为网络演化中政府资金的引导机制研究” (MS2025-06);中国科学技术信息研究所重点工作项目“面向战略决策的智能情报技术引擎研究及应用”(ZD2025-08)。 |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 韩颖霄1 张均胜 1, 2 郑 明 1 张兆锋 1 | (1. 中国科学技术信息研究所，北京 100038
2. 富媒体数字出版内容组织与知识服务重点实验室，北京 100038) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 74 |
| 全文下载次数: 84 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 随着科技研发合作在广度与深度上的持续拓展，论文合著作者数量显著增加。长期沿用以第一作者、通信作者为统计口径的荣誉分配方法，对科研环境产生了一些不利影响，亟须改进针对多作者论文的荣誉分配方式。提出一种基于均值思想的荣誉分类分配方法，即将合著作者划分为第一作者、通信作者、普通作者三类，按照“不同类型按比例分、同类型平分”的规则对论文荣誉进行分配，并以矿床学期刊EconomicGeology为例开展实证分析。该方法有助于缓解作者数量增长对文献计量工作带来的影响，并通过清晰可行的标准，使普通合著作者的贡献得以显性化。相关指标与图示可用于学者合著特征总结。未来研究可结合该方法与代表作数据库，构建具有参照锚点作用的补充性评价指标。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| With the increasing scale and depth of scientific collaboration, the number of co-authors on academic papers grown significantly. The long-standing practice of allocating credit based solely on the first and corresponding authors has had some adverse effects on the research environment. highlighting a pressing need to reform how credit is assigned in multi-author papers. This paper proposes a mean-based credit allocation method that classifies co-authors into three categories—first author, corresponding author, and ordinary author—and distributes publication credit following the principle of “proportional allocation across categories and equal sharing within each category.” An empirical analysis was conducted using the journal Economic Geology as a case study. The proposed method helps alleviate distortions caused by the growing number of authors in bibliometric assessments and offers a transparent framework to recognize the contributions of ordinary co-authors. The proposed metrics and visualizations can be used to summarize collaborative patterns among researchers. Future work may integrate this approach with representative publication databases to develop supplementary indicators that serve as reference anchors in research evaluation. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
