| 张爱霞 许燕 任亮 杜薇薇.国家科技报告制度实施的优化路径研究——基于撰写者诉求的实证分析[J].中国科技资源导刊,2026,(2):1~9 |
| 国家科技报告制度实施的优化路径研究——基于撰写者诉求的实证分析 |
| Research on the Optimization Path of the Implementation of the National Scientific and Technical Report System—An Empirical Analysis Based on Authors’Demands |
| 投稿时间:2025-10-09 |
| DOI: |
| 中文关键词: 科技报告制度;撰写者诉求;实施优化;路径研究;实证分析 |
| 英文关键词: Scientific and Technical Report System, authors’ demands, implementation optimization, path research, empirical analysis |
| 基金项目: |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 张爱霞 许燕 任亮 杜薇薇 | (中国科学技术信息研究所,北京 100038) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 35 |
| 全文下载次数: 45 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 科技报告是国家科技战略资源的重要组成部分。科技报告撰写者兼具生产者与用户双重属性,其诉求满足度与实践体验对制度落地效果具有决定性影响。基于2229名科技报告撰写者的问卷调查数据,采用定量统计与定性文本分析相结合的方法,系统梳理撰写者在制度认知、执行实践、质量管控、共享利用全链路中的主观认知、实践行为与核心诉求。研究发现,当前制度实施存在认知共识不足、全流程执行保障薄弱、质量管控缺位、共享反馈不畅等核心问题。据此,从认知协同、保障支撑、质量提升、共享利用4个维度构建优化路径,为提升国家科技报告制度实施效能、推动科技战略资源从规模积累向价值创造转型提供实证依据。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Scientific and technical reports are an important part of national science and technology strategic resources. Authors of scientific and technical reports have the dual attributes of producers and users, and the satisfaction of their demands and practical experience have a decisive impact on the effectiveness of system implementation. Based on the questionnaire survey data of 2229 authors of scientific and technical reports, this study adopts an empirical research method combining quantitative statistics and qualitative text analysis to systematically sort out the authors’ subjective cognition, practical behaviors and core demands in the whole chain of system cognition, implementation practice, quality control and utilization. The study finds that the current system implementation has core problems such as insufficient cognitive consensus, weak implementation support, lack of quality control, and poor sharing and feedback. Accordingly, a systematic optimization path is constructed from four dimensions: cognitive synergy, support guarantee, quality improvement, and sharing and utilization, aiming to provide empirical basis for improving the implementation effectiveness of the national scientific and |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|