| 李沫 宋微 李贺南.日本科技智库参与政府决策的模式及对我国的启示——以日本研究开发战略中心为例[J].中国科技资源导刊,2026,(4):68~77,102 |
| 日本科技智库参与政府决策的模式及对我国的启示——以日本研究开发战略中心为例 |
| Models of Japanese Science and Technology Think Tanks in Public Policy Making and Implications for China |
| 投稿时间：2026-03-20 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 日本智库；科学决策；科技政策；日本研究开发战略中心（CRDS） |
| 英文关键词: Japan think tank, science policy making, science and technology policy, center for research and development strategy (CRDS) |
| 基金项目:吉林省财政厅基本科研经费项目“基本科研日本热点科技信息动态监测对我国科技决策参考”（JX-JBKY-2025-14）。 |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 李沫 宋微 李贺南 | （吉林省科学技术信息研究所，吉林长春 130033） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 32 |
| 全文下载次数: 25 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 日本研究开发战略中心（CRDS）是官方科技智库，以其为研究对象，从组织架构、研究体系、成果传播等维度系统梳理CRDS的科技决策支撑模式与运行逻辑。运用文献调研法与量化文本分析法，依托日本官方公开资料，系统归纳CRDS服务政府科技决策的实施路径与成果传播机制，剖析其智库与科研体系与政策体系高效衔接的内在逻辑。研究表明，CRDS凭借规范化的研究方法体系、精细化的政策产出流程与多元化的成果推送机制，形成了适配日本治理场景的决策支撑范式。立足于中日科技治理体系、行政决策机制的制度差异，客观辨析CRDS智库运行模式的适配场景与固有特征，结合我国新型举国体制优势与智库建设现实需求，审慎甄别并选择性吸收其有益经验，并提出3条优化建议，即立足新型举国体制探索适配本土的“嵌入式”协同路径、推动智库成果精准触达与提升全球话语权、强化智库复合型专业能力建设，为我国新型科技智库提质增效、赋能科技治理现代化提供客观可行的参考借鉴。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| This paper takes Japan’s official science and technology think tank, the Center for Research and Development Strategy (CRDS), as the research object. It systematically sorts out CRDS’s science and technology decision-making support model and operational logic from the dimensions of institutional framework, research system and achievement dissemination. Adopting the methods of literature research and quantitative text analysis and based on publicly available official Japanese data, this paper summarizes the implementation path and achievement dissemination mechanism of CRDS in supporting governmental science and technology decision-making, and analyzes the internal logic of its efficient connection between scientific research systems and policy systems. The research finds that CRDS has formed a decision-making support paradigm adapted to Japan’s governance scenario relying on a standardized methodological system, refined policy output procedures and diversified achievement promotion mechanisms. Considering the institutional differences in science and technology governance and administrative decision-making mechanisms between China and Japan, this paper objectively distinguishes the applicable scenarios and inherent characteristics of CRDS’s operational model. Combined with the advantages of China’s new national system and the practical demands of think tank construction, this paper selectively absorbs the beneficial experience of CRDS and puts forward three optimization paths: exploring localized embedded collaborative paths under the new national system, improving the accurate dissemination of think tank achievements and global discourse power, and strengthening the compound professional capacity of think tanks. The research findings can provide objective and feasible references for promoting the high-quality development of China’s new-type science and technology think tanks and advancing the modernization of national science and technology governance. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
