| 蒋玉宏,冯琬婧.中美科研诚信治理的重点问题比较及启示[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2023,38(7):35~40 |
| 中美科研诚信治理的重点问题比较及启示 |
| Important Issues of Scientific Research Integrity Governanceof China and the United States |
| 投稿时间：2023-04-11 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1009-8623.2023.07.006 |
| 中文关键词: 中美；科研诚信；治理制度；比较研究 |
| 英文关键词: China and the United States; research integrity; governance system; comparative study |
| 基金项目:项目来源：科技部科技创新战略研究专项“青年科技人才培养和使用问题研究”（ZLY202273）。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 462 |
| 全文下载次数: 520 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 中美科研诚信制度和治理模式各有特点，两者的比较分析有助于发现和改进中国科研诚信治
理存在的问题。中美科研诚信治理的逻辑起点相同，但在制度体系以及科研不端行为治理范围、案件
查处机制和法律责任等方面存在一定的差异。与美国相比，中国科研诚信治理制度和模式呈现科研不
端行为种类多、调查主体类型多和政策制度层次多的特点，对有效调集和充分协调足够行政资源规制
各类科研不端行为提出更高要求。中国可适当借鉴美国相关经验做法，从完善科研诚信治理体系、落
实科研单位科研诚信建设主体责任、建立健全举报审查和激励机制和解决科研失信行为产生的深层
次问题等方面进一步完善科研诚信治理制度和模式。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Chinese and American research integrity systems and governance modes have their own
characteristics, and a comparative analysis of the two is helpful to identify and improve the weaknesses of Chinese
research integrity governance. China and the United States have the same logical starting point in the governance
of research integrity, but there are some differences in the system, governance scope, case investigation
mechanism, and legal liability. Compared with the United States, Chinese governance system and mode of research
integrity are characterized by more types of research misconduct, investigation subjects and more levels of policy
system. It puts forward higher requirements for the effective mobilization and coordination of administrative
resources. China can learn from the experience of the United States to further improve its governance system and
mode of research integrity from the aspects of improving the governance system of scientific research integrity,
imposing the entity responsibility of scientific research integrity construction, improving the incentive mechanism
for whistleblowers, and cracking the deep problems causing research misconduct. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
