| 胡月,玄兆辉,许竹青.自然指数评价方式分析及其局限性[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2025,(1):39~44 |
| 自然指数评价方式分析及其局限性 |
| Analysis on the Evaluation Methods and Limitations of Nature Index |
| 投稿时间：2024-09-06 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1009-8623.2025.01.005 |
| 中文关键词: 自然指数；科研能力；科研论文；局限性 |
| 英文关键词: nature index; scientific research capability; scientific research paper; limitations |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 34 |
| 全文下载次数: 49 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 自然指数（nature index，NI）为分析高质量科研产出提供了一种便捷方法。近期，英国自然出版集团发布了 2024 年《自然指数 - 研究者领袖》等一系列报告，从国家（地区）、城市、机构等维度对科研产出能力进行排名，引起了国内外广泛关注。报告显示，中国论文产出贡献份额大幅上升，科研城市排名前 10 强中有 5 个城市来自中国。基于历年自然指数报告的排名情况，对比分析各创新主体的科研产出和国际合作水平，深入研究自然指数的局限性和存在问题，并就如何正确看待自然指数评价结果
提出相关思考。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Nature index provides a convenient method for analyzing high-quality scientific research output.
Recently, the British Nature Publishing Group released a series of reports such as “2024 Nature Index-Researchers
Leaders”, ranking the scientific research output capacity from the dimensions of countries (regions), cities and
institutions, which attracted wide attention at home and abroad. According to the report, the contribution share of
China’s paper output has increased significantly, and five of the top 10 scientific research cities are from China.
This paper compares and analyzes the scientific research output and international cooperation level of various
innovative subjects, deeply studies the limitations and existing problems of nature index, and puts forward some
relevant thoughts on how to treat the results of nature index correctly. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
