| 王朝阳 1 马峥2 李超1 余慧1.期刊论文与预印本论文学科分布对比——以人工智能领域为例[J].中国科技资源导刊,2025,(2):58~71 |
| 期刊论文与预印本论文学科分布对比——以人工智能领域为例 |
| Comparative Study on the Discipline Distribution of Journal Papers and Preprint Papers |
| 投稿时间：2024-10-30 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 学术期刊;预印本;学科分布;人工智能;快速感知 |
| 英文关键词: journals, preprints, discipline distribution, artificial intelligence, rapid perception |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金一般项目“开放科学视域下科技期刊论文数据汇交模式研究”(22BTQ107) |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 王朝阳 1 马峥2 李超1 余慧1 | (1. 中国科学技术信息研究所，北京 100038
2. 中国科学院文献情报中心，北京 100090) |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 18 |
| 全文下载次数: 22 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 期刊与预印本是学术生态中的两种重要媒介，近年来预印本快速发展，分析两种文献类型学科分布的共性与差异可以加深理解预印本资源的优势与不足，探索期刊与预印本合作模式，为我国预印本生态发展提出建议。采用数据分析法，以人工智能领域为例，对比分析WebofScience数据库以及arXiv数据库2014—2023年相关文献的载文量、学科分布、研究热点以及变化趋势。这两种类型的文献表现出了截然不同的学科分类特点:期刊论文具备更强的跨领域学科交叉性，跨学科研究更加广泛;预印本能够快速地感知前沿技术发展以及学术热点的形成;与预印本相比，期刊论文的研究主题变化相对平缓，专注于科学研究的连续性与深入性。鉴于这两种资源呈现互补关系，应进一步探寻两种文献类型合作模式,促进期刊与预印本协同发展。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Journals and preprints are two important media in the academic ecology, and preprints have been developing rapidly in recent years. Analyzing the commonalities and differences in the distribution of the two types of literature can deepen the understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of preprint resources and explore collaboration models between journals and preprints, and provide suggestions for the development of preprint ecology in China. Using data analysis method, taking the field of artificial intelligence as an example, this paper compares and analyzes the number of articles, subject distribution, research hotspots and change trends of relevant literature in the Web of Science database and arXiv database from 2014 to 2023. The two types of literature show completely different subject classification characteristics, journal papers have stronger interdisciplinary and more extensive interdisciplinary research, while preprints can quickly perceive the development of cutting-edge technologies and the formation of academic hotspots, while the research topics of journal papers change relatively smoothly and focus on the continuity and depth of scientific research. The two resources are complementary, and the cooperation model of the two types of literature should be further explored to promote the collaborative development of journals and preprints |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
