| 王军辉.创新驱动发展战略背景下我国科技评价工作的政策性需求分析[J].全球科技经济瞭望,2022,37(7):7~14 |
| 创新驱动发展战略背景下我国科技评价工作的政策性需求分析 |
| Policy Demand Analysis of Science and Technology Evaluation in China Under the Background of Innovation-Driven Development Strategy |
| 投稿时间：2022-05-03 |
| DOI：10.3772/j.issn.1009-8623.2022.07.002 |
| 中文关键词: 科技评价；创新能力；代表作；文献计量 |
| 英文关键词: science and technology evaluation; innovation capability; representative works; bibliometrics |
| 基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“基于科学创造力测量的论文代表作识别方法研究”（21YJC870016）。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 609 |
| 全文下载次数: 376 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 本研究选择自创新驱动发展战略提出以来，国家层面所发布的科技评价相关政策文件作为分析对象，在文本分词的基础上进行关键词共现聚类分析，同步对批判性政策文本和基础研究评价相关政策文本进行单独分析。研究结果表明，我国科技评价工作的政策性需求包括紧密联系且相互配合的以创新能力和业绩为中心的人才评价、以贡献和代表作为中心的学术评价以及以创新质量和绩效为中心的机构和项目评价三大类评价方向，倾向是当前我国科技评价工作所要规避的主要内容，
“唯论文”而代表作评价则是学术评价尤其是基础研究评价的主要评价方法。综合政策文本分析结果，本文提出应加强创新导向性需求评价的理论和方法研究，以及代表作评价的方法研究和制度建设，助力形成有利于创新的科技评价制度。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Policy documents related to S&T evaluation issued by the national level since the innovation-driven development strategy was proposed are selected as the analysis objects. Based on Chinese word segmentation, keywords co-occurrence clustering analysis is carried out, and policy texts related to criticalness and basic research evaluation are separately analyzed simultaneously. The results show that the policy requirements of S&T evaluation in China include three categories of evaluation direction: talent evaluation centered on innovation capability and performance, academic evaluation centered on contribution and representative works, institutional and project evaluation centered on innovation quality and achievements. The tendency of “paper-centric” is the main content that should be avoided in S&T evaluation practices, and representative evaluation is the main evaluation method of the current academic evaluation, especially in basic research evaluation. Based on the analysis results of the policy text, it is proposed that the theory and method research of innovation-oriented demand evaluation should be strengthened, as well as the method research and system construction of representative evaluation, so as to help establish S&T evaluation system conducive to innovation. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
