文章摘要
刘亚丽 马 峥 王 璐 潘 尧.基于标志性论文的高校学科影响力评价方法研究[J].中国科技资源导刊,2022,(3):77~83
基于标志性论文的高校学科影响力评价方法研究
Research on the Evaluation Method of University Discipline Influence Based on Representative Papers
投稿时间:2021-12-31  
DOI:
中文关键词: 高校;影响力评价;机构评价;标志性论文;学科影响力
英文关键词: university, influence evaluation, institution evaluation, representative paper, discipline influence
基金项目:中国科学技术信息研究所创新研究基金面上项目“高质量发展方向指引下基于标志性论文的高校学科影响力评价方法 研究”(MS2021-07)
作者单位
刘亚丽 马 峥 王 璐 潘 尧 (中国科学技术信息研究所,北京 100038) 
摘要点击次数: 406
全文下载次数: 327
中文摘要:
      高质量发展方向指引下,为引导机构、学者等科研对象更加专注科学研究,创作、发表高质量科研成果, 提出基于标志性论文的高校学科影响力评价方法。在完成Web of Science与Essential Science Indicators学科分类映射的基 础上遴选高校学科标志性论文,按照被引频次将论文分级赋值。以农业科学为例进行实证分析,结果显示,基于标志 性论文的评价方法更易褒奖注重发表高质量论文的高校;评价周期长短对评价结果的影响较为有限;将基于标志性论 文的学科影响力评价结果与教育部第四轮学科评估结果进行对比分析,验证了基于标志性论文评价高校学科影响力方 法的可靠性。
英文摘要:
      Under the guidance of high-quality development direction, to guide institutions, scholars and other scientific research objects to focus more on scientific research and create and publish high-quality scientific research results, this paper proposes an evaluation method of academic influence in universities based on representative papers. Based on completing the subject classification mapping of Web of Science and Essential Science Indicators, representative papers of university disciplines are selected and graded according to citation frequency. Taking agricultural science as an example, the results show that the evaluation method based on representative paper is more likely to reward universities that focus on publishing high-quality papers. The length of evaluation period has limited influence on the evaluation results. The results of the evaluation of academic influence based on representative papers are compared with the results of the fourth round of academic influence evaluation conducted by the Ministry of Education to verify the reliability of the evaluation method of academic influence based on representative papers.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

分享按钮